Douglas Lichtman

Mr. Douglas Lichtman

Professor of Law, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES


          What is a GLG Leader?|The Gerson Lehrman Group&reg; (GLG) Leader Program<sup>SM</sup> is our premium Member Program<sup>SM</sup>. Those identified as GLG Leaders are in the top 5% of GLG CouncilRank and have an exclusivity agreement with GLG.

GLG News by Mr. Douglas Lichtman, Professor of Law

Analyses are solely the work of the authors and have not been edited or endorsed by GLG.

GLG News is now G+ Insights

G+ is a community for professionals, academics and entrepreneurs to connect through online discussions and in-person meetings. You will continue to see G+ Insights (formerly GLG News) here as well as on the G+ website, where you can share and discuss the G+ Insights you read.

Rambus Update: Worry about the EC

October 29, 2007

Rambus Says Senior Legal Advisor Resigns | www.reuters.com

Rambus just announced that one of its senior legal advisors has left the firm.  No wonder.  Rambus has been struggling with the same legal issues for years now; and with the EC now digging into that same mess, the end is nowhere near in sight.

QCOM/BRCM: New Trial Unlikely in Santa Ana

October 17, 2007

Judge May Grant QCOM a New Trial | biz.yahoo.com

There is significant confusion in the press over the status of the BRCM/QCOM dispute in Santa Ana.  The simple summary is that BRCM right now faces a choice: delay the final decision and have a chance at an extra $20M, or accelerate to a likely injunction but waive any right to that extra cash.  My suspicion?  BRCM will waive.

BYI v. IGT: IGT Moves for Summary Judgment

September 27, 2007

Bally sues IGT over new spinning wheel patent | www.gametechsummit.com

IGT just filed for summary judgment in one of its patent disputes involving rival BYI.  The motion is clever, but I suspect that it will fail, because IGT's motion requires the court to skip several analytical steps that the court should not be willing to skip.

QCOM v. BRCM: Why Willful Infringement is a Red Herring

September 27, 2007

Broadcom Wins One Battle in the QCOM War | www.thestreet.com

The analyst community has paid significant attention to the fact that the Santa Ana court is now reopening the BRCM patent case to rethink the question of whether QCOM's infringement was willful.  The interest is misplaced.  The original willfulness determination was important to understand because it was a signal of how things would go with respect to injunctive relief.  This round is largely irrelevant, with only a few weeks and $20M on the table.

Rambus: Another Step Toward the January Trial on JEDEC

September 27, 2007

Rambus Reply Motion re: FTC Findings | investor.rambus.com

One of the concerns facing Rambus as it prepares for trial this January is the worry that the court will simply defer to the FTC's factual conclusions about Rambus' behavior at JEDEC and the implications thereof.  This week, that risk was diminished, as the court not only declined to defer, but also implicitly suggested that some previously settled facts were again up for grabs.

Implications of the Third Circuit Decision

September 6, 2007

QCOM Wins Antitrust Appeal Against BRCM | www.reuters.com

The Third Circuit has reinstated significant parts of BRCM's antitrust case against QCOM.  In this post, I sketch some implications of that decision.

Align v. Ormco: Some Implications of the Recent Federal Circuit Ruling

August 30, 2007

Align Tech Says Appeals Court Agrees Ormco Claims Invalid | www.reuters.com

Last week's decision in the Align/Ormco appeal is hard to parse, and indeed on first blush might look like a win for Ormco.  A more careful analysis, however, reveals that Align's charaterization is closer to right: Ormco "won" a few claims, but those wins are far from strong, and they were paired with losses on other issues that are not only more significant but also more surprising.

Amgen v. Roche: Jury Trial About to Begin

August 28, 2007

Amgen Files Lawsuit Against Roche for Patent Infringement | www.amgen.com

The long-awaited patent case over EPO is about to start.  Amgen's core challenge will be to show that Roche's CERA is indeed an EPO variant that falls under Amgen's remaining EPO patents.  Roche on the other side will try to show that CERA is different enough that it ought not be considered to fall within the patents' scope.  My prediction: Amgen will win.

The Implications of a Possible Santa Ana Retrial in QCOM v. BRCM

August 28, 2007

QCOM could retry some counts in BRCM case | www.reuters.com

A few days ago, the judge in Santa Ana invited QCOM to petition for a new trial on the question of whether QCOM's infringement of the relevant BRCM patents was willful.  QCOM might as a result get a fresh shot on willfulness, but make no mistake: the original ruling is still important as a signal of how the judge is likely to rule on the injunction.

Rambus Under Fire

August 23, 2007

EU Accuses Rambus of Patent Ambush | biz.yahoo.com

The European Commission came out yesterday and announced tentative charges against Rambus over that firm's involvement with the standard-setting organization JEDEC.  The company downplayed the new allegations as if they are mere repeats of charges already addressed by the FTC.  But the EC allegations are in my view significantly more important than Rambus lets on.

The QCOM/BRCM Endgame

August 7, 2007

QCOM takes hit from legal setbacks | www.marketwatch.com

The last few days have brought yet another flurry of headlines in the BRCM/ QCOM litigation.  In this post, I run through some of the bigger surprises and their implications.

Implications for QCOM of the Verizon Settlement with BRCM

July 23, 2007

Qualcomm Views License Deal Between Verizon Wireless And Broadcom As Positive | www.rttnews.com

Last week brought the surprising news that Verizon, on the side, had managed to craft a comprehensive patent settlement with Broadcom.  Below, I survey some implications of that deal for QCOM.

How Strong is Sandisk's Patent Portfolio?

July 17, 2007

Sandisk: ITC Initial Determination Issued | www.allbusiness.com

Sandisk has long emphasized the strength of its patent portfolio. Yet those claims are hard to square against a recent loss at the ITC and an at-best odd settlement last month in a Texas court.

Preparing for Visto v. RIM

July 16, 2007

Visto Sues RIM for Patent Infringement | www.networkworld.com

Investors in RIM remember full well the patent fight with NTP.  Now on the horizon is a second significant patent litigation, this time with patent holder and competitor Visto.

TSRA: An Important Fight at the ITC

July 13, 2007

Tessera Provides Update on Actions to Protect IP | biz.yahoo.com

The ITC is poised to decide whether to move forward with Tessera's requested investigation of possible infringement by Qualcomm, Motorola, STMicro, and others, or whether instead to freeze the proceedings and wait for the Patent Office to finish at least some of its review of the relevant patents. The stakes are significant, given that Patent Office review can easily take years, and Tessera's patents have only a short term remaining.

A Bad Few Days for Limelight

June 27, 2007

Troubles Cast Shadow on Limelight's IPO | www.thestreet.com

Limelight's IPO is only a few days past, but the shine is already off, and with good reason. Limelight is likely to lose an important patent fight in the next few weeks, and that loss could severely cripple the business.

Strike Two For SANDISK

June 14, 2007

Sandisk's ITC Determination | ce.seekingalpha.com

SNDK lost a second case at the ITC this month, again failing to convince the ALJ that STMicro infringes any valid Sandisk patent. That has implications for SNDK's relationship with STMicro; but, more importantly, it rightly ought to leave everyone wondering about the strength of SNDK's patent portfolio, and nervous that SNDK might now have to face STMicro's most dangerous suit: the long-delayed but now entirely viable case over who owns SNDK's patents in the first place.

Limelight IPO: Patent Litigation Makes Timing Suspicious

June 4, 2007

Limelight IPO | www.limelightnetworks.com

Limelight's IPO looms on the horizon, but, from a patent perspective, the timing is suspicious at best. Limelight's bet-the-company patent litigation with Akamai is about to hit a huge and significant milestone. But the timing, obviously influenced heavily by insiders, is such that the IPO will happen first, then days later the patent case will become a whole lot clearer.

Nokia v. QCOM: Delays in Delaware

June 4, 2007

Nokia: Qualcomm row may hurt 3G adoption | news.zdnet.com

Nokia has publicly stated that its on-going rift with QCOM will likely hurt 3G adoption. That's true, but there is no end in sight, as even the fastest-moving case is now likely to be delayed significantly.

ITC Delay: Likely Bad News for QCOM

June 4, 2007

ITC Delays Patent Dispute Decision | biz.yahoo.com

The ITC's most recent delay has led to rampant speculation. My prediction: there will be an exclusion order, and it will be more binding than the order the ALJ crafted months ago.

Previous Page : 12345678Next61 to 80 of 147

Subscribe to Updates

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines

Leading institutions connect with Douglas Lichtman through GLG

Most Popular Legal, Economic & Regulatory Affairs News