Contributing Member of the Accounting & Financial Analysis Councils

Names and details of certain GLG News authors are available only to GLG Clients and Council Members. GLG News authors are subject-matter experts within the GLG Councils and are available for expert consulting - by phone, in-person, or written analysis. To find out how to become a GLG client or Council Member, click here.

GLG News by this Author

Analyses are solely the work of the authors and have not been edited or endorsed by GLG.

GLG News is now G+ Insights

G+ is a community for professionals, academics and entrepreneurs to connect through online discussions and in-person meetings. You will continue to see G+ Insights (formerly GLG News) here as well as on the G+ website, where you can share and discuss the G+ Insights you read.

MtM accounting provides one side results

March 20, 2009

Analysis of:SEC won't suspend mark to market - source | money.cnn.com

Mark-to-market (MtM) accounting while useful information for investors as a reference to future valuation and expected streams of cash flows, creates financial reports that are expected to provide in today's dollars all of the future value of the firms net worth. Given the numerous variables, including what discount rate to use in present valuation along with market price forecasts that exceed the tenor of liquid commodity futures, allows for mismanagement of the firms books. Its readily apparent that MtM has allowed many folks to be rewarded today for the all of the future cash profits, regardless of the time period. What is not considered in MtM is the present value of all the risk that the firm has undertaken. Stress testing scenarios that provide a 20% or more probability of occurrence should be used to net against the firms MtM valuation. To report the one side of the risk to return ration as an asset and basis of bonus is bad financial management.

Page : 11 to 1 of 1

Subscribe to Updates

By RSS