Contributing Member of the Energy & Industrials Councils

Names and details of certain GLG News authors are available only to GLG Clients and Council Members. GLG News authors are subject-matter experts within the GLG Councils and are available for expert consulting - by phone, in-person, or written analysis. To find out how to become a GLG client or Council Member, click here.

GLG News by this Author

Analyses are solely the work of the authors and have not been edited or endorsed by GLG.

GLG News is now G+ Insights

G+ is a community for professionals, academics and entrepreneurs to connect through online discussions and in-person meetings. You will continue to see G+ Insights (formerly GLG News) here as well as on the G+ website, where you can share and discuss the G+ Insights you read.

Economics Support Energy Efficiency and Fuel Switching

August 10, 2011

The Good News: Why Climate Change Doesn't Matter | www.energypulse.net

When Natural Gas prices spiked to almost $14/MMBTU in 2008 – triggering electric utility rates increases – energy efficiency programs were implemented. Similarly, low Natural Gas prices reflect a growing trend toward Base Load Power Plants.

Overcoming NIMBY

June 17, 2011

Public acceptance: the energy sector's biggest headache | www.europeanenergyreview.eu

The Not In My Back Yard [NIMBY] syndrome has been prevalent for decades. My involvement with NIMBY started in the 1970’s when a Coal-Fired Power Plant was proposed to be located in Staten Island NY. Later NIMBY blocked the proposed Waste-to- Energy facility to be located at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.

Nuclear Power Plants are Not Dead but Limited by Economics Driven by Shale Gas

May 28, 2011

Nuclear Power is Dead - Parts 1 & 2 | www.energycentral.com

The media has created an anxiety regarding Nuclear Power Plants. Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and “The China Syndrome” all contributed to putting a halt building new USA Nuclear Power Plants. The Fukishama incident, like the TVA Kingston Ash Spil and BP’s Gulf Oil Spill creates uncertainty regarding Coal Power Plants and Deep Oil Well Drilling – resulting in technically unjustified regulatory obstacles.

CCS – No Technical Leader and what to do with captured CO2?

January 16, 2011

Study finds IGCC plus pre-combustion CCS best option for replacing coal plants | www.powergenworldwide.com

Expected completion of FutureGen 2.0 using Oxy-combustion (Mc Dermott B&W), based on the assumption that its implementation is less expensive, by 2015 conforms to expected target date of 2020 for CO2 removal and capture plus sequestration regulations. Other projects demonstrating CO2 Capture are Chilled Ammonia (Astom) and Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (G.E.) should be on-line within this timeframe.

Legal Decision approving Xcel cost recovery - bad precedent

December 30, 2010

SmartGrid City Slammed - Who will pay for cost overages? | www.energybiz.com

ALJ G. Harris Adams delivered a surprising verdict on whether Xcel Energy's subsidiary, Public Service Company of Colorado, could recover $44.5 million from statewide ratepayers for its SmartGridCity project in Boulder Colorado's Office of Consumer Counsel was the most generous in its take on the case. The OCC allowed that the CPCN should be granted, but cost recovery limited to $27.9 million, a figure defined by Xcel in the spring of 2009, before eventual costs nearly doubled from there..

Using Carbon Dioxide Captured from Coal-Fired Power Plants

November 17, 2010

Carbon dioxide contamination possible even with sequestration | www.powergenworldwide.com

The Duke University contributes additional siting parameters restricting the already macro-geologically suitable regions for CO2 burial. From an engineering and cost-effective viewpoint, why bury the collected CO2; promote alternates approaches for its productive use.

Private sector funding for CO2 Capture – but Sequestration is another story

October 4, 2010

CCS could win private funding, finds survey | www.powergenworldwide.com

Investment Banks ( Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Merril Lynch) . are now regulated by Federal Reserve Bank. The Fed is risk adverse; re-entering potential for ‘systemic risk’. Venture Capital firms and Hedge Funds, although capable of providing funding, are uncertain about the viability of unproven technology (i.e. limited performance and operating data). CO2 capture has been demonstrated for several years [e.g. Tampa Electric/Polk Station] whereas CO2 burial is in the developmental stage.

Smaller units that reduce costs enhances Nuclear Industry Resurgence

September 26, 2010

New nuclear construction could be cut to 36 months | www.powergenworldwide.com

Nuclear power could generate 25 percent of the world’s electricity by 2050, according to a joint study by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA).

Future of Coal Fired Power Plants

July 29, 2010

Obama Overhaul of Regulatory Reviews Now Seen as Unlikely | www.nytimes.com

Approximately 50% of USA energy derives from coal-fired power plants. EIA predicts that by 2030 coal’s contribution will be reduced to about 35%. Natural Gas and Nuclear have been touted as replacing coal for based loaded power plants. Their implementation includes obstacles such a volatile costs and disposal issues.

Implications: UK’s funding CCS (Coal-Fired Power Plants)

March 21, 2010

UK launches "CCS economic zone" | www.powergenworldwide.com

UK’s funding of CCS technology confirms government commitment of coal while enhancing their recovery of North Sea Oil. E.ON or Scottish Power would realize operating experience with CCS technology. Which suppliers (e.g. B&W, Alstom, G.E.) would receive contracts to demonstrate their technology – providing selected vendor competitive advantage.

onsite storage nuclear waste EU AND USA

February 21, 2010

Europe eyes underground nuclear waste repositories | www.france24.com

Both EU and USA suffer from lack of designated long-term storage for spend fuel rods i.e. highly radioactive waste. but question asked by GLG i.e. France ocean dumping nuclear waste - is not reflected by reference article "France, along with Britain, Japan and Russia, currently reprocess their nuclear waste and then hold it in an interim storage facility, before the "intended disposal in deep geological repositories," which is the final resting place for high-level radioactive waste," .

RETROFIT OR CONVERT COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS

February 14, 2010

MULTIPOLLUTANT POWER PLANT BILL INTRODUCED | carper.senate.gov

Air Pollution control technology, commercially available, can be retrofitted to older coal-fired power plants. Cost, per plant, cost $100’s MM. Conversely some of these plants could be converted to burn to burn bio-mass e.g. First Energy RE Burger Station.

Coal Combustion Residues - Economic and Engineering Considerations

December 23, 2009

EPA delays announcement on regulating coal ash | www.google.com

Classification of Coal ash or Coal Combustion Products [CCBs] as Hazardous Waste per Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA] Section C would impose an onerous liability on potential end-users [fly ash in road construction and FGD By-Product Gypsum in cement and wall-board]. Economic analyzes pegged the costs as high as $13 billion a year. On Oct. 16 another draft regulation was submitted to OMB – details and associated costs are yet to be made public..

Burning Coal while Controlling Greenhouse Gas Emissions

October 4, 2009

The Energy Disconnect | www.energytribune.com

Scientific peer-review, media political biases & pragmatic business planning suggest accepting the concept that reducing Greenhouse Gases (CO2) specifically from coal power plants. Avoid debating unreliability of climatological models, CO2 regulation or argue costs of renewable energy Solar, Wind vs. coal, Electric Utilities & governmental agencies spendi research & development & demonstration monies to establish engineering knowledge to implement Carbon Capture and Sequestration [CCS].

expands service base to own and operate with benefit of European self-financing.

September 19, 2009

Balfour buys Parsons Brinckerhoff | www.ft.com

Parsons Brinckerhoff [PB] is an old line Engineering Construction i.e. Engineering, Procurement and Construction [EPC] with strong roots in USA particularly Highways, Bridges and Rapid Transit (e.g. BART). Balfour’s acquisition provides PB will capability to expand its service base to include own and operate. Balfour should be able to facilitate European [e.g. UK] investing in public-private partnerships.

Coal Combustion Byproducts [CCBs] (e.g. fly ash, bottom ash, flue gas desulfurization FGD Sludge) can be used to retrofit disposal ponds - avoiding upsets like TVA Kingston TN

July 5, 2009

E.P.A. Lists ‘High Hazard’ Coal Ash Dumps | www.nytimes.com

 Capitalizing on the inherent physical-chemical properties of CCBs facilitated strengthening of dike walls to prevent failure – evidenced by TVA’s Kingston spill. USEPA’s ‘high hazard listing’ for such CCB ponds relate to their proximity to habitation – an engineering failure concern, similar to levee and earthern dams. From an environmental regulatory standpoint CCBs are deemed Solid Waste not a hazardous waste. Coal Combustion Byproducts [CCBs] are presently regulated as Solid Waste [Subtitle D] under the Resource Conservation Recovery Act [RCRA]. Such classification promotes beneficial use by enders-users i.e. mitigating excessive liability.  Stringent regulation, as Subtitle C (Hazardous Waste), would impose a perceived liability upon end-users; greatly reducing beneficial use opportunities.  Mandatory use of synthetic liners – would not have prevented dike wall failure and fails to consider inherent engineering characteristics of CCBs.

Short Term trends do not reflect Power Plant Investments

May 27, 2009

Power usage down all over | www.energycentral.com

The Wood-McKenzie report just shows reduced electrical demand and sales over the last six months. Electric Utilities do may suffer short-term sales reduction but power plants, costing a upwards of one Billion Dollars, are not built for the short term market. Given the short-term outlook, electric utilities may suffer from reduced demand but lower sales revenues may be offset my lower cost of fuel e.g. coal prices have dropped 30-50%. Long term investors may find opportunity in lower prices for forward thinking electric utilities; those who balance a portfolio with based load coal and nuclear while investing in renewable such as solar, wind and bio-mass

Besides justifying additional power plants based on: (1) projected demand (2) new job creations (3) increased tax revenues, Electric Utilities must proactively address environmental issues prior public hearings. Power plant projects, most notably coal-fired units, have suffered from a false public perception that such technology will contribute to pollution (e.g. health) and environmental degradation (e.g. global warming). The public and media arena requires electric utilities to consider carbon

March 24, 2009

Stimulus Money Puts Clean Coal Projects on a Faster Track | www.nytimes.com

The USA has about 200 years of coal and at present coal provides 50 % of our Electrical Energy. Capture Capture and Sequestration [CCS] is demosntrated technology e.g.  CO2 capture at TECO [IGCC at Polk Station] and CO2 has been injected into geological formations to facilitiate extracted oil [industrial practice for over twenty years]. Commerical offerring including performance gurarantees are available to chosed Electric Utilities who intend to build and/or retrofit coal fired power plants. Typically regulated electric utilies could pass the increased cost for CCS through their customer rate based.

Using Captured CO2 – Resolving Carbon Capture and Sequestration’s Outstanding Issue

June 2, 2008

Quest for clean coal smolders | www.iht.com

Integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC), a commercially demonstrated technology for Carbon (CO2) capture is marketed as turnkey approach via Bechtel and General Electric’s long-term alliance. The recent alliance with Schlumberger addresses the outstanding question of what to do with captured CO2. The alliance of Bechtel, GE and Schlumberger offers Electric Utilities a turn-key option to address Green House Gas Issues  Carbon  Capture and Sequestration [Storage] – promoting coal-fired power plants.

RAILROADS FORCED TO REDUCE COST OF TRANSPORTING LOW SULFUR COAL

May 23, 2008

Union Pacific must cut coal rates for KC utility | biz.yahoo.com

MANDATING TRANSPORT COST LOW SULFUR POWDER RIVE BASIN COAL SUGGESTS A TREND THAT COULD APPLY BEYOND MISSOURI AND TO OTHER STATES E.G. TEXAS Reducing transport cost of coal would provide economic impeturs for additional coal-fired units in Mid-West and South 

Page : 12Next1 to 20 of 26

Subscribe to Updates

RSS By RSS

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe in Bloglines

This author consults with leading institutions through GLG