David Freeman

Mr. David Freeman

Principal and President, TeamOne Energy, Inc.


          What is a GLG Leader?|The Gerson Lehrman Group&reg; (GLG) Leader Program<sup>SM</sup> is our premium Member Program<sup>SM</sup>. Those identified as GLG Leaders are in the top 5% of GLG CouncilRank and have an exclusivity agreement with GLG.

Member of the Natural Resources Council

Request a consultation with David Freeman

Council Member Biography

David Freeman is President of TeamOne Energy, a consultancy focused on power marketing, commodity risk mitigation, gas supply and independent power generation that he started in October 2002. Previously, Mr. Freeman was Senior Vice President at Panda Energy, a large independent power developer and Vice President and General Manager at Aquila, a leading utility, energy marketing, trading & risk management company. During his career, Freeman led energy risk mitigation efforts for independent power projects receiving Merchant Power Deal of the Year awards in 2007 and 2001. He has worked in the gas & power utility & energy trading industry since 1976, where he developed and implemented business development and risk mitigation plans for gas & power projects throughout the USA. Mr. Freeman has served as an arbitrator & expert witness in various gas & power disputes. He serves on the advisory board of the Power Marketers Association, the boards of directors of four corporations and is a member of the Energy Bar Association. (This is me - Update Profile)


Employment History

2002 - Unspecified
Principal and President, TeamOne Energy, Inc.
2001 - 2002
Senior Vice President, PANDA ENERGY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - DELAWARE
1996 - 2001
Vice President (EMI) & General Manager, KCP&L GREATER MISSOURI OPERATIONS COMPANY
1986 - 2001
General Manager , Aquila Energy Corporation

GLG NewsSM Analyses by David Freeman

Opinions and analyses expressed in G+ Insights are solely those of the author. See the Terms of Use for details.


GLG News is now G+ Insights

G+ is a community for professionals, academics and entrepreneurs to connect through online discussions and in-person meetings. You will continue to see G+ Insights (formerly GLG News) here as well as on the G+ website, where you can share and discuss the G+ Insights you read.

Nuclear is mostly dead but it has little to do with Japan

May 27, 2011

Nuclear Power is Dead - Parts 1 & 2 | www.energycentral.com

The costs for new nuclear plant construction were non-economic well before TEPCO's Fukushima  disaster. Clearly most new USA generation will be gas fired combined cycle turbines. Renewables continue improve economically. However, they will only be niche contributors do to poor capacity factors and ancillary infrastructure costs (ie; transmission and back up power). ERCOT Texas will be an interesting early test of these dynamics.

Misguided Call for Oklahoma Oil Regulator Market Intervention

April 1, 2011

Cushing oil storage glut causes concern for producers | newsok.com

The Oklahoma Corporation Commission should let free market forces work rather than intervene as requested Thursday by  Domestic Energy Producers Alliance and Oklahoma Independent Producers Association.

Nuclear Power will Not Contribute to Supply – Japan No Impact

March 14, 2011

Japan nuclear fears lift solar stocks | money.cnn.com

Hopes for nuclear power to contribute to USA thirsts for noncarbon based baseload power where quietly dead on arrival well before the Japanese earthquake and related nuclear problems. The two reasons are current construction costs of $8000 to $10,000 per kW are uneconomic and no viable alternative for waste fuel disposal. Current enthusiasm for renewables, in light of this disaster, would be better placed on natural gas related power supply.

The Time is Ripe for Demand Side Management

August 13, 2007

Is there green in 'misfit' technologies? | www.nytimes.com

The USA power industry has entered an era of significant technology change involving retail uses of electricity. These will delay the need for some expensive peaking generation plants and transmission wires. The economic advantages of derregulated regions (northeast & Texas) will become most evident as they avoid costly new infrastructure (power plants & transmission) by allowing those causing peak demand to be charged a greater share of those costs. Those locations and time-of-use demands will invest in new technologies that enable them to avoid cosstly use during peak periods. These economic signals and savings will be more muted in regions where retail consumers are still captive to single source energy monopolies (the west, midwest and southeast).