Mr. Nathan Brookwood

Research Fellow, Insight 64

Member of the Technology Council

Request a consultation with Nathan Brookwood

Council Member Biography

Nathan Brookwood is Research Fellow at Insight 64, a semiconductor consulting firm. He has worked for and with suppliers of mainframes, minicomputers, personal computers, and semiconductors, and he has analyzed and commented on the industry from perches at D.H. Brown Associates, Inc., and Dataquest. Although best known for his knowledge of the semiconductor industry, Mr. Brookwood also works in closely allied system markets where semiconductor technology plays a key role. At Insight 64 and Gartner, Inc., he focused on microprocessors used in computational applications. His views on the microprocessor market often find their way into articles in mainstream media, business media, and the trade press. During his 40 year career in the industry, Mr. Brookwood has held marketing management positions at Micronics Computers, a PC component supplier, the Advanced Processor Division of Intergraph Corporation, Convergent Technologies, Inc., and Prime Computer, Inc. He also held marketing and development management positions at Digital Equipment Corporation. (This is me - Update Profile)

Employment History

2008 - Unspecified: Research Fellow, Insight 64
1998 - 2008: Principal Analyst, Insight 64

GLG News^SM Analyses by Nathan Brookwood

Opinions and analyses expressed in G+ Insights are solely those of the author. See the Terms of Use for details.

GLG News is now G+ Insights

G+ is a community for professionals, academics and entrepreneurs to connect through online discussions and in-person meetings. You will continue to see G+ Insights (formerly GLG News) here as well as on the G+ website, where you can share and discuss the G+ Insights you read.

How will Intel’s Decision to Cancel Larrabee Impact Intel, AMD and Nvidia?

December 7, 2009

Analysis of:Intel Scraps Plan For Graphics Chip | online.wsj.com

Intel’s decision to cancel its first generation Larrabee design gives AMD and Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) two more years without significant competition from Intel in the discrete GPU market, and lets these vendors gain momentum in the GPU Computing segment. Don’t count Intel out; the second generation LRB design will be a far stronger product than the Gen 1 product would have been.

Even 2-D Users Will Miss Nvidia's Integrated 3-D Graphics on Core i3/i5 Systems

October 8, 2009

Analysis of:Nvidia Escalates Feud With Intel | online.wsj.com

Nvidia's chipsets outperform Intel's when it comes to integrated 3-D graphics, but Intel's move to incorporate graphics into its Core i3/i5 CPUs leaves no room for Nvidia's integrated solution. Too bad! Windows 7's DirectCompute feature speeds up media operations on systems with AMD or Nvidia discrete or integrated GPUs, but won't work with Intel's integrated graphics. Even users who don't care about 3-D may notice this media deceleration on Core i3/i5 systems that lack discrete GPUs.

Fermi versus AMD Radeon: Who Wins, Who Loses in Supercomputing Applications?

October 4, 2009

Analysis of:Supercomputer to use new Nvidia 'Fermi' chip | news.cnet.com

While AMD and Nvidia battle for supremacy in the GPU computing arena, there's one obvious loser, Intel. AMD's 5870 appeared on schedule. Nvidia's Fermi is late, but its GTX 280 series still is competitive. Intel's Larrabee remains a no-show. End users who buy their systems by the teraflop have discovered and validated an alternative approach that requires fewer x86 CPUs, less power, and less space. GPU computing is here to stay, and the market will punish those who lack a competitive offering.

Intel’s 45nm Penryn: Cool Process but Ho-Hum Processor

November 13, 2007

Analysis of:Intel Ships Power-Efficient Penryn CPUs | www.pcworld.com

Intel's turned its PR apparatus on high today, trumpeting the launch of its first 45nm processors, code-named Penryn. The company can certainly claim credit as the first CPU vendor to ship 45nm products, but the products it launched now are merely warmed over versions of the mature 65nm designs it introduced last year. The good news is that these chips work in the same desktop, notebook and server platforms as the models they replace. This simplifies the qualification process for OEM system suppliers and end users. The bad news is that the new process improves the new chips' performance by ten to fifteen percent on average -- hardly anything to get excited about. We don't expect these new chips to have much impact on the competitive positions of Intel and AMD, but the new chips are roughly 30 percent smaller than the ones they replace, and thus will indirectly increase Intel's production capacity by about a third. This explains why Intel recently trimmed its CAPEX forecast.

Will vPro Turn Intel Around?

April 27, 2006

Analysis of:Intel Plans Enterprise Platform Brand | www.reed-electronics.com

Intel recently launched vPro™, its new brand for business-oriented desktop PCs. The company hopes that vPro will do for its desktop PC business what the Centrino brand did for notebooks in 2003. Centrino introduced the mobile lifestyle for notebook computer users, something users could not do prior to its introduction. Viiv and Vpro just allow users to do what they already are doing, merely with less hassle than before. This seems to me like a fairly weak proposition.

View All GLG News ^SM Analyses by Nathan Brookwood

Request a consultation with Nathan Brookwood

GLG Study Groups with Nathan Brookwood(?)

Study Group Name	No. Members
TMT Council Members in Member Programs	18316
Technology Council Members in Member Programs	9587
Semiconductor & Component Experts	712
Semiconductor Experts in GLG Member Programs (US)	641
Semiconductor Experts	585