February 9, 2007
Money on the Lines | online.wsj.com
The US is beginning a major building cycle for electric transmission assets.
The increase spending on transmission assets roughly $ 8MMM per year is up 16% from last year and nearly 65% from 2003, which was the year of the big blackout. Part of the effort is simply catch-up as the investment has been a low priority for many years. Now the potential rates of return have increased under FERC regulation for certain projects, and because increased transmission will result in increased revenue on a fixed cost base. Neil Kalton of A. G. Edwards the author of the report predicts increased returns on equity for transmission plant which will be in 11-14% range.
Part of the increased spending will be for enhance reliability and improvement in the grid for greater flexibility. Other investment is to integrate green assets into the grid, and also to allow easier movement of power between pools.
These projects represent a real sea change for the industry. Until very recently, nobody thought that it would be possible to build any new transmission in certain areas, which will have them now.
January 31, 2007
FASB to Implement Tax Changes Without Delay | www.msnbc.msn.com
Many companies and others are making strong arguments that the implementation of FIN 48 which modifies SFAS No. 109 be delayed. On January 17, 2007 the FASB said that implementation would not be delayed, but better guidance would be available in time for the first quarter 2007 filing date. See the following CFO article for more information:
http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/8547954/c_8552964?f=TodayInFinance011807_h
It seems that everyone, the FASB and the SEC are in a hurry to begin implementation but the targets are not. Robert Herz, FASB chairman, said: "Investors we've talked to say this is needed information and it's needed now. The overall benefit to investors and the capital market of getting this done and getting it done in the time frame we've talked about is the overriding objective."
The speed in which this rule has been written and imposed will result in the need for much clarification, and evidence that any investors want this information in this way seems to very scant indeed.
January 23, 2007
IASB, FASB Announce Working Group Members | accounting.smartpros.com
This piece is thin, considered alone, however there has been a lot written about what new rules might and should do. The paper is not due until 2008, though meetings will begin on the subject before that. The original documents are as follows:
www.fasb.org/news/nr071906.shtml FASB Formally Adds Project to Reconsider Lease Accounting
www.sec.gov/news/studies/soxoffbalancerpt.pdf Sec Staff Report On Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Special Purpose Entities and Related Issues
The issue refuses to die, however for that reason I will revisit some of the issues in an earlier article in a different way. http://news.glgroup.com/cm/Analysis/Logs.aspx?a=p&lid=7002&pid=3039
The following analysis explains why capitalizing operating leases is both illogical and contrary to fundamental GAAP.
January 11, 2007
Grant Thornton LLP Supports Review of Lease Accounting Rules as FASB/IASB Working Group is Named | home.businesswire.com
Grant Thornton has gotten out in front of a very old issue, changes in lease accounting, which is now subject to a review by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). This project has been in the works for a long time, with the first meeting for February 2007.
"The current lease standards need to be changed to give investors greater transparency in the reporting of financial information," said Grant Thornton LLP CEO, Edward Nusbaum, when asked "should lease accounting rules be revised to give investors more transparency." Though there maybe opposition, GT shows that 63% of senior controllers and CFOs agreed that "lease accounting rules need to be revised to give investors more transparency."
In the Grant Thornton presentation, however, people claim to speak for investor needs and desires, with no investor actually cited. The only implication is that for reasons of their own, some accountants want the rules changed, without an analyst in view.
January 3, 2007
Insiders with a curious edge | yahoo.businessweek.com
The best part of the plan is that the planner does not have to specify the number of shares, can stop and start plans at will or run multiple plans at once. Not only that, but the plans allow execs to trade around earnings announcements and other significant events which are normally "blackout dates."
The author cites a good deal of research to show that the plans have out performed the market, and that people have use the plans judiciously in the case of Aetna’s (Gen. Custer’s life insurer), management where they got out before a major share-price correction.
December 28, 2006
Vitesse Explains Firing of KPMG | www.cfo.com
On December 20, Vitesse Semiconductor issued an 8-K in which: "The Board of Directors has dismissed KPMG LLP based on its lack of independence. The Board is in contact with other independent public accounting firms and will work to engage a new independent public accounting firm as soon as practicable." This new found lack of independence is based on company plans to sue the auditor after an internal investigation found evidence of a broad range of accounting problems including option backdating.
Mr. Kiima wrote a delightful piece on the issue but I think that there are some things other than ‘shock and awe’ at the total silliness of the situation.
December 27, 2006
Gilead Sciences Early Warning | www.auditintegrity.com
Audit Integrity believes that Gilead is at risk of both legal action and declining market performance.
Audit Integrity rated Gilead Sciences ‘Very Aggressive’ with an AGR® (Accounting & Governance Risk) score was 21 for the 2Q 2006, its lowest score over 12 quarters based on signs of financial engineering related to investment and acquisition accounting.
Audit Integrity believes that the Gilead’s compensation structure places it at risk of declining market performance, law suits and enforcement actions, centered on the high level of merger activity and overly aggressive accounting, manifested in Gilead’s low AGR® score.
December 8, 2006
Investors Sue 13 Private Equity Firms | www.cfo.com
"No matter whether the Constitution follows the flag or not, the Supreme Court follows the election returns."
-Peter Finley Dunne
Is NutriSystem Really Just a Bloater?
November 28, 2006
NutriSystem Early Warning | www.auditintegrity.com
This group has developed a following for being able to pick problem stocks out of the herd, with an emphasis on the likelihood of future litigation. For this particular company they record a number of areas of concern:
Quite a list of troubles it would seem, but what really might the problems be?
November 27, 2006
M&A Synergies? Don't Count On It | www.businessfinancemag.com
This article is based on a survey of corporate executives that states that there is evidence that M&A doesn’t necessarily greatly translate into shareholder value, but there are mergers that do, and that is why people keep at it. Of those surveyed only about half thought that there were either revenue or cost synergies. The strongest agreement in the poll was that it helped mergers helped retain the right people both for the buyer and seller, increased customer satisfaction.
Changes in the tax situation are important too, and were not noted in the article
Sovereign and financial crises: Europe and the U.S.
January 18, 2012
How much longer can the Japanese Yen be a "haven currency"?
December 13, 2011
Not all bank tech vendors are equal
December 12, 2011
Eksportfinans downgrade surprises investors
December 5, 2011